The rise of international schools in China: Critical perspectives on trends and issues


 Presenter (s) Wenxi Wu, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Title The rise of international schools in China: critical perspectives on trends and issues

With intensifying internationalization of education at the K-12 level, schools that are identified as ‘international’ have proliferated, especially in Asia. Compared with the traditional kind of international schools for the globally mobile expatriates, newly emerged international schools are characterized by a more localized student body, more pragmatic-oriented schooling purposes, and more commercialized and corporatized forms of operation. These profound, qualitative transformations have made international schools more complex than previously understood, and have opened up significant terrains for new research agendas.

Situated in this context, this study focuses on the recent surge of international schools in China. As these schools become more visibly positioned in China’s education system, the conditions and processes of their development deserve a closer inspection. In this paper, I will begin with an analysis of the changing definitions of international schools in the Chinese context and present a contemporary profile of China’s international schools. Then, by analyzing their development against the changing patterns in the global international schooling landscape, I will highlight the market interest as a central feature of international schools in China today, with a consideration of what becomes questionable during this process.

By reviewing both international and Chinese literature on international schooling, analyzing industry and media reports surrounding international schools in China, and by adding context with my own experience as a former practitioner in an international school, I will discuss various contradictions facing China’s international schooling vis-à-vis the market economy, the solidifying social classes, and different policy contexts between nations at the providing and receiving ends of international education.

I will argue that, first, the Anglo-American-led monopoly of global quality standards in international education programs has forced international schools in China to become franchised in an established chain of exogenously-originated accreditation, assessment, and university admission systems. This scenario has induced utilitarian consumer behavior in education, thus limiting opportunities for innovation and negotiation for knowledge construction at national and community levels.

Second, international schools in China have acted as sifting machines that select students with not only the economic capital but also the economically valued cultural and intellectual capital. These privileged forms of capital have generated imbalances of power among schools, educators, students and their families through the production and normalization of specific cultural scripts or imaginaries in education.

Third, the strong market potential of international schools in China is about to expand the arena where culturally dominant countries in the world promote and transmit established brands of knowledge as a means to maintain competitiveness at both political and economic points of vantage. This vantage will, in turn, sustain the continuous morphing of the global international school market while deepening the asymmetry between export and import of educational products and human resources.

I will conclude with a call for more critically engaged research and policy initiatives that serve to properly guide and support international schools in China and other countries facing this new wave of international schooling movement.

Wenxi Wu is a doctoral student at the Department of Educational Administration and Policy at The Chinese University of Hong Kong.


To contact Wenxi Wu, send an email to

3 Responses

  1. Jieyu Jiang

    This is a very clear and well-organized poster as well as research! In the poster, effective information such as the contributing factors for the increasing international schools, types of international schools, and critical critiques are distinctively and logically listed out and arranged. It is reasoning-consistent for this poster to explain how and why the international schools in China have increased a lot in recent years. What’s more, the author raised three critical observations/analysis on this phenomenon, which raises the issue of unequal international education power discourses and westernized educational/students-cultivating standards. This is a very important analysis! However, only one comment for this research is that the logic of it to me seems like self-proved, because the increasing international schools in China is, per se, the product of educational system and discourses being westernized and influenced by “modern” (The Anglo-American-led monopoly) global system. Students in international schools are cultivated to satisfy the western educational/schooling standards. I think what is more thoughtful and interesting might be, why those schools target at “wealthier” groups and families and How is that view/idea (international schools might provide better education than local schools) formed and become commonsense to people who choose/not choose so, and why they prefer international schools (Chinese citizens) when they have to spend more money and meanwhile, they could enjoy general compulsory schools’ education? But anyway, this is a super meaningful insight and critique on this topic!

Leave a Reply to Carol Benson Cancel Reply